FireStream 9270 vs Quadro 3000M
When comparing FireStream 9270 and Quadro 3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9270 and Quadro 3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9270
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Quadro 3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 113% more power consumption, than Quadro 3000M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9270 and Quadro 3000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 300 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro 3000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 2975 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 16% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Quadro 3000M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Fermi |
| Code name | RV770 | Fermi |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 18.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |