GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro 3000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 3000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 3000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro 3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro 3000M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro 3000M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 3000M are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 850 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and Quadro 3000M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 1075 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 42% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 78% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 111% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 32% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro 3000M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | GF104 | Fermi |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 18.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.1 |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | 28 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |