GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro 3000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro 3000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 465 stacks up against Quadro 3000M, check out specs charts below.
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Quadro 3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 465 has 166% more power consumption, than Quadro 3000M.
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro 3000M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
GeForce GTX 465 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro 3000M are build with Fermi architecture.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 765 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro 3000M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 978 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
2−3
ultra / 1080p
8−9
1−2
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
12−14
medium / 1080p
18−20
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
20−22
5−6
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
16−18
medium / 1080p
24−27
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
200−210
120−130
medium / 768p
170−180
95−100
ultra / 1080p
95−100
40−45
QHD / 1440p
50−55
21−24
4K / 2160p
30−33
16−18
high / 768p
130−140
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 87% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
35−40
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
100−110
75−80
medium / 768p
90−95
45−50
ultra / 1080p
60−65
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Dota 2 is 75% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
2−3
ultra / 1080p
14−16
2−3
4K / 2160p
6−7
2−3
low / 720p
35−40
10−12
medium / 1080p
18−20
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
10−11
ultra / 1080p
18−20
5−6
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
low / 720p
95−100
50−55
medium / 1080p
50−55
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Fortnite is 162% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
5−6
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
8−9
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
50−55
18−20
medium / 1080p
27−30
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Forza Horizon 4 is 211% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
80−85
45−50
medium / 768p
70−75
−
high / 1080p
27−30
4−5
ultra / 1080p
12−14
2−3
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
9−10
2−3
ultra / 1080p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
4−5
medium / 1080p
12−14
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
4K / 2160p
−
75−80
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
27−30
medium / 1080p
24−27
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
6−7
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
50−55
10−11
medium / 768p
30−35
8−9
high / 1080p
18−20
4−5
ultra / 1080p
10−11
4−5
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
100−110
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
30−35
14−16
high / 768p
50−55
30−33
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Quadro 3000M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Quadro 3000M
Architecture
Fermi
Fermi
Code name
GF100
Fermi
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
31 May 2010
22 February 2011
Pipelines
352
240
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
450 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
26.7 billion/sec
18.00
Floating-point performance
855.4 gflops
432.0 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
625 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
+
2.1
CUDA cores
352
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
64 Mh/s
28 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Compute performance
30x
Check Price
Check Price
