GeForce GTX 670 vs Quadro 3000M
When comparing GeForce GTX 670 and Quadro 3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 670 and Quadro 3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670
Quadro 3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
170 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 670 has 126% more power consumption, than Quadro 3000M.
GeForce GTX 670 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 670 and Quadro 3000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce GTX 670 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 670 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 670 is 530 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
GeForce GTX 670 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 3000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro 3000M is 619 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
2−3
ultra / 1080p
21−24
1−2
QHD / 1440p
16−18
0−1
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
12−14
medium / 1080p
40−45
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
55−60
−
ultra / 1080p
45−50
5−6
QHD / 1440p
35−40
0−1
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
low / 720p
100−110
16−18
medium / 1080p
60−65
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 670 and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
120−130
medium / 768p
220−230
95−100
ultra / 1080p
180−190
40−45
QHD / 1440p
110−120
21−24
4K / 2160p
70−75
16−18
high / 768p
210−220
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
60−65
65−70
ultra / 1080p
−
20−22
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
120−130
75−80
medium / 768p
110−120
45−50
ultra / 1080p
100−110
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
45−50
2−3
ultra / 1080p
40−45
2−3
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
14−16
2−3
low / 720p
80−85
10−12
medium / 1080p
45−50
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
60−65
10−11
ultra / 1080p
45−50
5−6
QHD / 1440p
27−30
4−5
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
50−55
medium / 1080p
110−120
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
60−65
5−6
ultra / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
30−35
3−4
4K / 2160p
24−27
2−3
low / 720p
100−110
18−20
medium / 1080p
65−70
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
140−150
45−50
medium / 768p
120−130
−
high / 1080p
70−75
4−5
ultra / 1080p
30−35
2−3
QHD / 1440p
21−24
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
2−3
ultra / 1080p
20−22
0−1
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
0−1
low / 720p
65−70
4−5
medium / 1080p
30−35
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
130−140
85−90
high / 1080p
−
80−85
4K / 2160p
−
75−80
medium / 1080p
120−130
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro 3000M.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
100−110
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
6−7
medium / 1080p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
130−140
10−11
medium / 768p
85−90
8−9
high / 1080p
45−50
4−5
ultra / 1080p
24−27
4−5
4K / 2160p
16−18
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
50−55
14−16
high / 768p
60−65
30−33
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Quadro 3000M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670
Quadro 3000M
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi
Code name
GK104
Fermi
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
10 May 2012
22 February 2011
Pipelines
1344
240
Core clock speed
980 MHz
450 MHz
Boost Clock
980 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
102.5 billion/sec
18.00
Floating-point performance
2,459.5 gflops
432.0 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256-bit GDDR5
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
625 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192.2 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
+
2.1
CUDA cores
1344
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
97 Mh/s
28 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
13 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price