GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro 3000M
When comparing GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro 3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro 3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 760A
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro 3000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro 3000M has 36% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro 3000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 178 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 3000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 3383 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Fortnite is 25% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro 3000M | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK106 | Fermi |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 22 February 2011 |
Pipelines | 768 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 450 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 18.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 625 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 3.0 | 2.1 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |