GeForce GTX 960A vs Quadro 3000M

When choosing between GeForce GTX 960A and Quadro 3000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 960A and Quadro 3000M.

GeForce GTX 960A

Quadro 3000M Check Price

Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:

Quadro 3000M Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 960A	Quadro 3000M
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
Both video cards are using MXM-B (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GTX 960A and Quadro 3000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce GTX 960A is used in Desktops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 960A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 579 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
GeForce GTX 960A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 3000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 4387 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	2−3
ultra / 1080p	7−8	1−2
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	12−14
medium / 1080p	14−16	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	5−6
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	16−18
medium / 1080p	21−24	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 960A.
low / 768p	180−190	120−130
medium / 768p	150−160	95−100
ultra / 1080p	80−85	40−45
QHD / 1440p	45−50	21−24
4K / 2160p	30−33	16−18
high / 768p	120−130	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 67% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p	55−60	65−70
ultra / 1080p	30−35	20−22
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
GeForce GTX 960A and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	100−110	75−80
medium / 768p	80−85	45−50
ultra / 1080p	50−55	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Dota 2 is 63% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p	14−16	2−3
ultra / 1080p	12−14	2−3
4K / 2160p	5−6	2−3
low / 720p	30−35	10−12
medium / 1080p	14−16	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p	21−24	10−11
ultra / 1080p	16−18	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	4−5
low / 720p	85−90	50−55
medium / 1080p	40−45	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Fortnite is 121% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p	21−24	5−6
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
QHD / 1440p	6−7	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	40−45	18−20
medium / 1080p	21−24	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Forza Horizon 4 is 155% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p	75−80	45−50
medium / 768p	65−70	−
high / 1080p	21−24	4−5
ultra / 1080p	10−11	2−3
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p	8−9	2−3
ultra / 1080p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	4−5
medium / 1080p	10−11	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
high / 1080p	−	80−85
ultra / 1080p	95−100	−
4K / 2160p	−	75−80
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	45−50	27−30
medium / 1080p	21−24	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	21−24	6−7
medium / 1080p	14−16	−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p	40−45	10−11
medium / 768p	27−30	8−9
high / 1080p	14−16	4−5
ultra / 1080p	9−10	4−5
4K / 2160p	7−8	1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p	95−100	75−80
medium / 768p	55−60	35−40
ultra / 1080p	30−33	14−16
high / 768p	45−50	30−33
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in World of Tanks is 45% more, than Quadro 3000M.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 960A	Quadro 3000M
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Code name	GM107	Fermi
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	13 March 2015	22 February 2011
Pipelines	640	240
Core clock speed	1029 MHz	450 MHz
Boost Clock	1085 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	43.40	18.00
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops	432.0 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	625 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.0	2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	180 Mh/s	28 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
		Check Price

GeForce GTX 960A vs Quadro 3000M

Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares