GeForce MX330 vs Quadro 3000M
In this comparison between GeForce MX330 and Quadro 3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX330 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce MX330 and Quadro 3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce MX330 and Quadro 3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX330 or Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX330
Quadro 3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
10 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 3000M has 650% more power consumption, than GeForce MX330.
GeForce MX330 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
GeForce MX330 and Quadro 3000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce MX330 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce MX330 is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 1081 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
GeForce MX330 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Quadro 3000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 6375 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
2−3
ultra / 1080p
8−9
1−2
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
12−14
medium / 1080p
16−18
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
5−6
QHD / 1440p
5−6
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
45−50
16−18
medium / 1080p
24−27
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX330.
low / 768p
200−210
120−130
medium / 768p
170−180
95−100
ultra / 1080p
90−95
40−45
QHD / 1440p
50−55
21−24
4K / 2160p
30−33
16−18
high / 768p
130−140
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 85% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
35−40
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
100−110
75−80
medium / 768p
90−95
45−50
ultra / 1080p
60−65
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Dota 2 is 75% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
2−3
ultra / 1080p
14−16
2−3
4K / 2160p
5−6
2−3
low / 720p
35−40
10−12
medium / 1080p
16−18
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
10−11
ultra / 1080p
18−20
5−6
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
low / 720p
90−95
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Fortnite is 143% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
5−6
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
8−9
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
45−50
18−20
medium / 1080p
24−27
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Forza Horizon 4 is 188% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
80−85
45−50
medium / 768p
70−75
−
high / 1080p
27−30
4−5
ultra / 1080p
10−12
2−3
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Grand Theft Auto V is 122% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
9−10
2−3
ultra / 1080p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
4−5
medium / 1080p
12−14
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
4K / 2160p
−
75−80
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
50−55
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
24−27
6−7
medium / 1080p
14−16
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
50−55
10−11
medium / 768p
30−35
8−9
high / 1080p
16−18
4−5
ultra / 1080p
10−11
4−5
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
100−105
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
30−35
14−16
high / 768p
50−55
30−33
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Quadro 3000M.
Full Specs
GeForce MX330
Quadro 3000M
Architecture
Pascal
Fermi
Code name
N17S-LP / N17S-G3
Fermi
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
20 February 2020
22 February 2011
Pipelines
384
240
Core clock speed
1531 MHz
450 MHz
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
Transistor count
1,800 million
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
16 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
38.26
18.00
Floating-point performance
432.0 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
7000 MHz
625 MHz
Memory bandwidth
48.06 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
6.1
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
28 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
