GRID M10 8Q vs Quadro 3000M
When choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Quadro 3000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M10 8Q and Quadro 3000M.
GRID M10 8Q
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Quadro 3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro 3000M.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 583 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 3000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 4575 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 220% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 69% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 143% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 111% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Quadro 3000M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Code name | GM107 | Fermi |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 18.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 2.1 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |