HD Graphics 630 vs Quadro 3000M
In this comparison between HD Graphics 630 and Quadro 3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics 630 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
HD Graphics 630
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 630 | Quadro 3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 3000M has 400% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- HD Graphics 630 has 62 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
- HD Graphics 630 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- HD Graphics 630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 3000M is 150 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 3000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| HD Graphics 630 and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Fortnite is 18% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Minecraft is 10% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| HD Graphics 630 and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in World of Tanks is 2% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 630 | Quadro 3000M | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Fermi |
| Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | Fermi |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 1 January 2017 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 18.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 625 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |