Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Quadro 3000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro 3000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics 645 stacks up against Quadro 3000M, check out specs charts below.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro 3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro 3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 or Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Quadro 3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 3000M has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Quadro 3000M is 150 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 3000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
2−3
ultra / 1080p
2−3
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
12−14
medium / 1080p
5−6
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro 3000M.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
16−18
medium / 1080p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
medium / 768p
80−85
95−100
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
QHD / 1440p
24−27
21−24
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
high / 768p
60−65
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
12−14
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
65−70
75−80
medium / 768p
45−50
45−50
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
5−6
2−3
ultra / 1080p
5−6
2−3
4K / 2160p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
10−12
medium / 1080p
5−6
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
8−9
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
45−50
50−55
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Fortnite is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
8−9
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
16−18
18−20
medium / 1080p
9−10
8−9
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p
40−45
45−50
medium / 768p
35−40
−
high / 1080p
7−8
4−5
ultra / 1080p
5−6
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p
3−4
2−3
ultra / 1080p
2−3
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
4−5
medium / 1080p
4−5
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
high / 1080p
80−85
80−85
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
4K / 2160p
−
75−80
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
16−18
10−11
medium / 768p
12−14
8−9
high / 1080p
6−7
4−5
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
80−85
75−80
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
high / 768p
30−33
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Quadro 3000M.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Quadro 3000M
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Fermi
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Fermi
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
10 July 2019
22 February 2011
Pipelines
48
240
Core clock speed
300 MHz
450 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
18.00
Floating-point performance
432.0 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
625 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.103
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
28 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
