Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro 3000M
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro 3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro 3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro 3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro 3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Quadro 3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
eDRAM
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 3000M has 66% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Quadro 3000M is 250 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro 3000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
2−3
ultra / 1080p
5−6
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
12−14
medium / 1080p
10−12
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
16−18
medium / 1080p
16−18
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
160−170
120−130
medium / 768p
130−140
95−100
ultra / 1080p
65−70
40−45
QHD / 1440p
35−40
21−24
4K / 2160p
27−30
16−18
high / 768p
100−110
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
24−27
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
medium / 768p
70−75
45−50
ultra / 1080p
40−45
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
10−12
2−3
ultra / 1080p
10−11
2−3
4K / 2160p
4−5
2−3
low / 720p
24−27
10−12
medium / 1080p
12−14
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
10−11
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
70−75
50−55
medium / 1080p
30−35
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 78% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
5−6
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
QHD / 1440p
3−4
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
18−20
medium / 1080p
18−20
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
60−65
45−50
medium / 768p
55−60
−
high / 1080p
18−20
4−5
ultra / 1080p
8−9
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
6−7
2−3
ultra / 1080p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
4−5
medium / 1080p
8−9
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
high / 1080p
95−100
80−85
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
4K / 2160p
−
75−80
medium / 1080p
95−100
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
16−18
6−7
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
30−35
10−11
medium / 768p
21−24
8−9
high / 1080p
12−14
4−5
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
4K / 2160p
7−8
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
medium / 768p
50−55
35−40
ultra / 1080p
24−27
14−16
high / 768p
40−45
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 32% more, than Quadro 3000M.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Quadro 3000M
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Fermi
Code name
Haswell GT3e
Fermi
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
5 June 2013
22 February 2011
Pipelines
40
240
Core clock speed
200 MHz
450 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
52.00
18.00
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
432.0 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
625 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.80
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
28 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price