Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Quadro 3000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Quadro 3000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Quadro 3000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Quadro 3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Quadro 3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe MAX Graphics or Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Quadro 3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
LPDDR4x
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 MB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Xe MAX Graphics has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is used in Laptops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is build with Gen. 12 Xe architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro 3000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 3641 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
2−3
ultra / 1080p
21−24
1−2
QHD / 1440p
16−18
0−1
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
12−14
medium / 1080p
40−45
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
55−60
−
ultra / 1080p
45−50
5−6
QHD / 1440p
35−40
0−1
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
low / 720p
100−110
16−18
medium / 1080p
60−65
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
120−130
medium / 768p
220−230
95−100
ultra / 1080p
180−190
40−45
QHD / 1440p
110−120
21−24
4K / 2160p
70−75
16−18
high / 768p
210−220
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
60−65
65−70
ultra / 1080p
−
20−22
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
120−130
75−80
medium / 768p
110−120
45−50
ultra / 1080p
100−110
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
45−50
2−3
ultra / 1080p
40−45
2−3
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
14−16
2−3
low / 720p
80−85
10−12
medium / 1080p
45−50
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
60−65
10−11
ultra / 1080p
45−50
5−6
QHD / 1440p
27−30
4−5
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
50−55
medium / 1080p
110−120
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
60−65
5−6
ultra / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
30−35
3−4
4K / 2160p
24−27
2−3
low / 720p
100−110
18−20
medium / 1080p
65−70
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
140−150
45−50
medium / 768p
120−130
−
high / 1080p
70−75
4−5
ultra / 1080p
30−35
2−3
QHD / 1440p
21−24
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
2−3
ultra / 1080p
20−22
0−1
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
0−1
low / 720p
65−70
4−5
medium / 1080p
30−35
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
130−140
85−90
high / 1080p
−
80−85
4K / 2160p
−
75−80
medium / 1080p
120−130
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro 3000M.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
100−110
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
6−7
medium / 1080p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
130−140
10−11
medium / 768p
85−90
8−9
high / 1080p
45−50
4−5
ultra / 1080p
24−27
4−5
4K / 2160p
16−18
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
50−55
14−16
high / 768p
60−65
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Quadro 3000M.
Full Specs
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Quadro 3000M
Architecture
Gen. 12 Xe
Fermi
Code name
iDG1LPDEV
Fermi
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
31 October 2020
22 February 2011
Pipelines
96
240
Core clock speed
450 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
10 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
18.00
Floating-point performance
432.0 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
4266 MHz
625 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 12.1
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
28 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
