P106 090 vs Quadro 3000M
In this comparison between P106 090 and Quadro 3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people P106 090 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P106 090
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
| P106 090 | Quadro 3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
- P106 090 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- P106 090 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
- P106 090 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- P106 090 is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 904 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- P106 090 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Quadro 3000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 7383 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 280% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 88% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Dota 2 is 83% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Fortnite is 162% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Forza Horizon 4 is 222% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Grand Theft Auto V is 138% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 60% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| P106 090 | Quadro 3000M | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Code name | GP106 | Fermi |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 31 July 2017 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 73.49 | 18.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 2.1 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |