P106 100 vs Quadro 3000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between P106 100 and Quadro 3000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the P106 100 stacks up against Quadro 3000M, check out specs charts below.
P106 100
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
| P106 100 | Quadro 3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- P106 100 has 60% more power consumption, than Quadro 3000M.
- P106 100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- P106 100 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
- P106 100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- P106 100 is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of P106 100 is 1056 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- P106 100 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Quadro 3000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 100 is 7383 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| P106 100 and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| P106 100 | Quadro 3000M | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Code name | GP106 | Fermi |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 19 June 2017 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1709 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 136.7 | 18.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 2.1 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |