Quadro 3000M vs Quadro FX 4800
When comparing Quadro 3000M and Quadro FX 4800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 3000M and Quadro FX 4800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 4800
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 3000M | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 152 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 975 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| Quadro 3000M and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Battlefield 5 is 12% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro 3000M and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| Quadro 3000M and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| Quadro 3000M and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| Quadro 3000M and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| Quadro 3000M and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Quadro 3000M and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Minecraft is 2% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Quadro 3000M and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| Quadro 3000M and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| Quadro 3000M and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 3000M | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Fermi | GT200B |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.00 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 625 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 1.3 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |