Quadro 3000M vs Quadro K2200
When comparing Quadro 3000M and Quadro K2200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 3000M and Quadro K2200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 3000M
Quadro K2200
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
68 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 3000M has 10% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200.
Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro K2200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K2200 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro K2200 - in Desktops.
Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K2200 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 596 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 4387 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
18−20
ultra / 1080p
1−2
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
4−5
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
6−7
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro 3000M and Quadro K2200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
220−230
medium / 768p
95−100
190−200
ultra / 1080p
40−45
110−120
QHD / 1440p
21−24
75−80
4K / 2160p
16−18
40−45
high / 768p
65−70
160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 119% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
65−70
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
21−24
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
2−3
7−8
low / 720p
10−12
45−50
medium / 1080p
4−5
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
110−120
medium / 1080p
10−12
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Fortnite is 206% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
30−35
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
10−12
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 288% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
95−100
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
4−5
35−40
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
4−5
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
80−85
−
4K / 2160p
75−80
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro 3000M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
10−11
65−70
medium / 768p
8−9
40−45
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−33
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Quadro 3000M.
Full Specs
Quadro 3000M
Quadro K2200
Architecture
Fermi
Maxwell
Code name
Fermi
GM107
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
22 February 2011
22 July 2014
Pipelines
240
640
Core clock speed
450 MHz
1046 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
18.00
44.96
Floating-point performance
432.0 gflops
1,439 gflops
Length
202 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
625 MHz
5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
80.19 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
2.1
5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
28 Mh/s
162 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
1.6 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price
