Quadro 3000M vs Quadro K5000
In this comparison between Quadro 3000M and Quadro K5000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 3000M will be the best choice, for others Quadro K5000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 3000M
Quadro K5000
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
122 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K5000 has 62% more power consumption, than Quadro 3000M.
Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro K5000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K5000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro K5000 - in Desktops.
Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K5000 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K5000 is 256 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K5000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K5000 is 4775 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
20−22
ultra / 1080p
1−2
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
4−5
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 380% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
−
30−35
ultra / 1080p
5−6
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
16−18
65−70
medium / 1080p
6−7
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro 3000M and Quadro K5000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
230−240
medium / 768p
95−100
200−210
ultra / 1080p
40−45
110−120
QHD / 1440p
21−24
85−90
4K / 2160p
16−18
45−50
high / 768p
65−70
160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
65−70
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
21−24
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Dota 2 is 108% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
24−27
ultra / 1080p
2−3
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
2−3
7−8
low / 720p
10−12
50−55
medium / 1080p
4−5
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Far Cry 5 is 550% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
30−35
ultra / 1080p
5−6
24−27
QHD / 1440p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
120−130
medium / 1080p
10−12
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Fortnite is 237% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
30−35
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
QHD / 1440p
3−4
12−14
4K / 2160p
2−3
12−14
low / 720p
18−20
65−70
medium / 1080p
8−9
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
100−110
medium / 768p
−
90−95
high / 1080p
4−5
40−45
ultra / 1080p
2−3
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
12−14
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
4−5
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Metro Exodus is 633% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
high / 1080p
80−85
−
4K / 2160p
75−80
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro 3000M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
70−75
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
1−2
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
6−7
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
10−11
70−75
medium / 768p
8−9
45−50
high / 1080p
4−5
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
14−16
4K / 2160p
1−2
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 560% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
40−45
high / 768p
30−33
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Quadro 3000M.
Full Specs
Quadro 3000M
Quadro K5000
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Code name
Fermi
GK104
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
22 February 2011
17 August 2012
Pipelines
240
1536
Core clock speed
450 MHz
706 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
18.00
90.37
Floating-point performance
432.0 gflops
2,169 gflops
Length
267 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
625 MHz
5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
172.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
2.1
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
28 Mh/s
111 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
2.2 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price
