Quadro 3000M vs Quadro K600
In this comparison between Quadro 3000M and Quadro K600 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 3000M will be the best choice, for others Quadro K600 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 3000M
Quadro K600
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
41 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 3000M has 82% more power consumption, than Quadro K600.
Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro K600 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro 3000M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro K600.
Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro K600 - in Desktops.
Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K600 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K600 is 426 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K600 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K600 is 1157 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
0−1
ultra / 1080p
1−2
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
1−2
medium / 1080p
4−5
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Quadro K600.
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
0−1
medium / 1080p
6−7
−
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K600 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
120−130
60−65
medium / 768p
95−100
27−30
ultra / 1080p
40−45
7−8
QHD / 1440p
21−24
−
4K / 2160p
16−18
−
high / 768p
65−70
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 196% more, than Quadro K600.
low / 768p
65−70
70−75
ultra / 1080p
20−22
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K600 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
75−80
45−50
medium / 768p
45−50
10−11
ultra / 1080p
21−24
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Dota 2 is 113% more, than Quadro K600.
high / 1080p
2−3
−
ultra / 1080p
2−3
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
10−12
0−1
medium / 1080p
4−5
−
high / 1080p
10−11
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−12
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Fortnite is 136% more, than Quadro K600.
high / 1080p
5−6
0−1
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
8−9
0−1
low / 768p
45−50
18−20
high / 1080p
4−5
0−1
ultra / 1080p
2−3
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
35−40
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than Quadro K600.
high / 1080p
2−3
−
ultra / 1080p
0−1
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
4−5
0−1
medium / 1080p
3−4
−
low / 768p
85−90
75−80
high / 1080p
80−85
27−30
4K / 2160p
75−80
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Minecraft is 60% more, than Quadro K600.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 720p
27−30
8−9
medium / 1080p
14−16
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Quadro K600.
low / 720p
6−7
0−1
low / 768p
10−11
0−1
medium / 768p
8−9
−
high / 1080p
4−5
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 768p
75−80
45−50
medium / 768p
35−40
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
0−1
high / 768p
30−33
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in World of Tanks is 92% more, than Quadro K600.
Full Specs
Quadro 3000M
Quadro K600
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Code name
Fermi
GK107
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
22 February 2011
1 March 2013
Pipelines
240
192
Core clock speed
450 MHz
876 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
18.00
14.02
Floating-point performance
432.0 gflops
336.4 gflops
Length
160 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
625 MHz
1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
28.51 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
2.1
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
28 Mh/s
11 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
