Quadro 3000M vs Quadro K620M
When comparing Quadro 3000M and Quadro K620M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 3000M and Quadro K620M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 3000M and Quadro K620M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro 3000M and Quadro K620M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M or Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 3000M
Quadro K620M
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
30 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 3000M has 150% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro 3000M and Quadro K620M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 579 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K620M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K620M is 1375 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
3−4
ultra / 1080p
1−2
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
4−5
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
−
7−8
ultra / 1080p
5−6
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
18−20
medium / 1080p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
95−100
95−100
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
21−24
24−27
4K / 2160p
16−18
−
high / 768p
65−70
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
65−70
70−75
ultra / 1080p
20−22
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
Quadro 3000M and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
75−80
75−80
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
4−5
ultra / 1080p
2−3
3−4
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
10−12
14−16
medium / 1080p
4−5
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
12−14
ultra / 1080p
5−6
7−8
QHD / 1440p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
55−60
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Fortnite is 18% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
6−7
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
8−9
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
4−5
8−9
ultra / 1080p
2−3
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
2−3
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
4−5
7−8
medium / 1080p
3−4
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
high / 1080p
80−85
65−70
4K / 2160p
75−80
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro K620M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
27−30
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
Quadro 3000M and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
10−11
16−18
medium / 768p
8−9
12−14
high / 1080p
4−5
6−7
ultra / 1080p
4−5
4−5
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
75−80
70−75
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
high / 768p
30−33
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Quadro K620M.
Full Specs
Quadro 3000M
Quadro K620M
Architecture
Fermi
Maxwell
Code name
Fermi
GM108
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
22 February 2011
1 March 2015
Pipelines
240
384
Core clock speed
450 MHz
1029 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
18.00
17.98
Floating-point performance
432.0 gflops
863.2 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
625 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
2.1
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
28 Mh/s
92 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
