Quadro 3000M vs Radeon HD 4810
When choosing between Quadro 3000M and Radeon HD 4810, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro 3000M and Radeon HD 4810.
Radeon HD 4810
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 3000M | Radeon HD 4810 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 95 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4810 has 26% more power consumption, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon HD 4810 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4810 has 510 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4810 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon HD 4810 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 175 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4810 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 2975 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 196% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4810 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Dota 2 is 113% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Fortnite is 136% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Minecraft is 60% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | − |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in World of Tanks is 92% more, than Radeon HD 4810. |
Full Specs
Quadro 3000M | Radeon HD 4810 | |
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale |
Code name | Fermi | RV770 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | 28 May 2009 |
Pipelines | 240 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 625 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.00 | 20.00 |
Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Length | 246 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 625 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |