Quadro 3000M vs Radeon R7 A265

In this comparison between Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 A265 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 3000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A265 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro 3000M Check Price

Radeon R7 A265

Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:

Quadro 3000M Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro 3000M	Radeon R7 A265
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x8
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price

Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 A265 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 A265 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 A265 - in Desktops.
Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A265 is 275 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A265 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 A265 is 1175 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	1−2
ultra / 1080p	1−2	0−1
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	12−14	12−14
medium / 1080p	4−5	3−4
Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
ultra / 1080p	5−6	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	16−18	12−14
medium / 1080p	6−7	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	95−100	85−90
ultra / 1080p	40−45	35−40
QHD / 1440p	21−24	−
4K / 2160p	16−18	10−11
high / 768p	65−70	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	65−70	70−75
ultra / 1080p	20−22	14−16
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	75−80	70−75
medium / 768p	45−50	45−50
ultra / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	2−3	2−3
ultra / 1080p	2−3	2−3
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	10−12	10−11
medium / 1080p	4−5	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	10−11	−
ultra / 1080p	5−6	5−6
QHD / 1440p	4−5	1−2
low / 720p	50−55	45−50
medium / 1080p	10−12	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Fortnite is 20% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	5−6	3−4
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	18−20	14−16
medium / 1080p	8−9	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	45−50	40−45
high / 1080p	4−5	3−4
ultra / 1080p	2−3	2−3
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	35−40	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	2−3	1−2
ultra / 1080p	0−1	0−1
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	4−5	3−4
medium / 1080p	3−4	2−3
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	85−90	85−90
high / 1080p	80−85	55−60
4K / 2160p	75−80	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	12−14	12−14
low / 720p	27−30	24−27
medium / 1080p	14−16	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
ultra / 1080p	−	3−4
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	10−11	8−9
medium / 768p	8−9	7−8
high / 1080p	4−5	3−4
ultra / 1080p	4−5	3−4
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	75−80	70−75
medium / 768p	35−40	35−40
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
high / 768p	30−33	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Radeon R7 A265.

Full Specs

	Quadro 3000M	Radeon R7 A265
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 1.0
Code name	Fermi	Opal
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	22 February 2011	9 January 2014
Pipelines	240	384
Core clock speed	450 MHz	725 MHz
Boost Clock		825 MHz
Transistor count	1,950 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	18.00	19.80
Floating-point performance	432.0 gflops	633.6 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	625 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	28 Mh/s
Laptop size	large
	Check Price

Quadro 3000M vs Radeon R7 A265

Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares