Quadro 3000M vs Radeon R7 M270DX
When choosing between Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 M270DX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 M270DX.
Radeon R7 M270DX
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 3000M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | IGP |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 450 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Battlefield 5 is 12% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Minecraft is 2% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
low / 720p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. |
Full Specs
Quadro 3000M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Fermi | Topaz |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | 11 June 2014 |
Pipelines | 240 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.00 | 22.56 |
Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 625 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |