Quadro 3000M vs Radeon R7 M465X
In this comparison between Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 M465X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 3000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M465X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M465X
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 3000M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M465X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 M465X have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 450 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M465X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 3875 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Dota 2 is 30% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Fortnite is 63% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Minecraft is 11% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 3000M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Fermi | Tropo |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.00 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 625 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |