Quadro 3000M vs Radeon R9 370
When choosing between Quadro 3000M and Radeon R9 370, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro 3000M and Radeon R9 370.
Radeon R9 370
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 3000M | Radeon R9 370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 110 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 370 has 46% more power consumption, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 370 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro 3000M and Radeon R9 370 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 475 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 370 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 4975 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 3000M and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 10−11 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Quadro 3000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro 3000M | Radeon R9 370 | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Fermi | Trinidad |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 240 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 975 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.00 | 78.00 |
Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Length | 221 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 625 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | 336 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |