Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro 3000M vs Radeon RX 460

    When comparing Quadro 3000M and Radeon RX 460, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 3000M and Radeon RX 460 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    Quadro 3000M Check Price
    Radeon RX 460 Check Price

    Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:

    Quadro 3000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      Quadro 3000M Radeon RX 460
    Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 75 Watt
    Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x8
    Supplementary power connectors None
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
      Check Price Check Price
    • Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
    • Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon RX 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
    • Radeon RX 460 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
    • Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX 460 - in Desktops.
    • Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon RX 460 - with Polaris.
    • Core clock speed of Radeon RX 460 is 640 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
    • Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 is 6375 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 2−3 21−24
    ultra / 1080p 1−2 12−14
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 7−8
    4K / 2160p − 5−6
    low / 720p 12−14 40−45
    medium / 1080p 4−5 24−27
    The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Quadro 3000M.

    Full Specs

      Quadro 3000M Radeon RX 460
    Architecture Fermi Polaris
    Code name Fermi Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
    Type Mobile workstation Desktop
    Release date 22 February 2011 8 August 2016
    Pipelines 240 896
    Core clock speed 450 MHz 1090 MHz
    Boost Clock 1200 MHz
    Transistor count 1,950 million 3,000 million
    Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 14 nm
    Texture fill rate 18.00 67.20
    Floating-point performance 432.0 gflops 2,150 gflops
    Length 170 mm
    Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 625 MHz 7000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 80 GB/s 112.0 GB/s
    Shared memory - -
    DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (12_0)
    Shader Model 5.1 6.4
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 1.1 2.0
    Vulkan N/A 1.2.131
    CUDA 2.1
    FreeSync +
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 28 Mh/s 240 Mh/s
    Laptop size large
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares