Quadro 3000M vs Radeon RX 560X
In this comparison between Quadro 3000M and Radeon RX 560X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 3000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 560X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon RX 560X
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 3000M | Radeon RX 560X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
- Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon RX 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon RX 560X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX 560X - in Desktops.
- Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon RX 560X - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 560X is 725 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 560X is 6375 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 114% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Dota 2 is 97% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Fortnite is 200% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Forza Horizon 4 is 288% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Quadro 3000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro 3000M | Radeon RX 560X | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Fermi | Polaris 21 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | 11 April 2018 |
Pipelines | 240 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 1175 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1275 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.00 | 81.60 |
Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | 2,611 gflops |
Length | 170 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 625 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |