Quadro 3000M vs Radeon RX Vega 11
When comparing Quadro 3000M and Radeon RX Vega 11, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 3000M and Radeon RX Vega 11 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon RX Vega 11
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 3000M | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 3000M has 400% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega 11.
- Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon RX Vega 11 uses IGP interface.
- Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - with Vega.
- Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Dota 2 is 51% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Fortnite is 94% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Forza Horizon 4 is 122% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Grand Theft Auto V is 77% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in World of Tanks is 37% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 3000M | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Vega |
| Code name | Fermi | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 26 October 2017 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 704 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1240 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 4,940 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.00 | 61.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | 1,760 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 625 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |