Quadro 3000M vs Tesla C2075

When comparing Quadro 3000M and Tesla C2075, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 3000M and Tesla C2075 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:

Main Specs

  Quadro 3000M Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 247 Watt
Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI
  Check Price Check Price
  • Tesla C2075 has 229% more power consumption, than Quadro 3000M.
  • Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
  • Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
  • Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
  • Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
  • Core clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 124 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
  • Quadro 3000M and Tesla C2075 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 2507 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 2−3 16−18
ultra / 1080p 1−2 10−11
QHD / 1440p 0−1 4−5
low / 720p 12−14 35−40
medium / 1080p 4−5 21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 320% more, than Quadro 3000M.

Full Specs

  Quadro 3000M Tesla C2075
Architecture Fermi Fermi 2.0
Code name Fermi GF110
Type Mobile workstation Workstation
Release date 22 February 2011 25 July 2011
Pipelines 240 448
Core clock speed 450 MHz 574 MHz
Transistor count 1,950 million 3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Texture fill rate 18.00 32.14
Floating-point performance 432.0 gflops 1,030.4 gflops
Length 248 mm
Memory bus width 256 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 625 MHz 3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth 80 GB/s 150.3 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.1 5.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.1 1.1
Vulkan N/A N/A
CUDA 2.1 2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 28 Mh/s 94 Mh/s
Laptop size large
  Check Price Check Price