Quadro 3000M vs Tesla M60
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro 3000M and Tesla M60, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro 3000M stacks up against Tesla M60, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M60
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 3000M | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 300% more power consumption, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M60 is 107 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 4387 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 760% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 766% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro 3000M and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 1150% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 468% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 771% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 372% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 1400% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1100% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 10−11 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1180% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 62% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 3000M | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Fermi | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.00 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 625 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 5.2 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |