Quadro 3000M vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro 3000M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro 3000M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro 3000M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro 3000M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M or Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Quadro 3000M
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
12−14
ultra / 1080p
1−2
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
30−33
medium / 1080p
4−5
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
6−7
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
120−130
200−210
medium / 768p
95−100
170−180
ultra / 1080p
40−45
90−95
QHD / 1440p
21−24
50−55
4K / 2160p
16−18
24−27
high / 768p
65−70
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
65−70
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
90−95
ultra / 1080p
21−24
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 83% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
16−18
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
4K / 2160p
2−3
5−6
low / 720p
10−12
35−40
medium / 1080p
4−5
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
4−5
12−14
low / 720p
50−55
95−100
medium / 1080p
10−12
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 150% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
3−4
6−7
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
18−20
50−55
medium / 1080p
8−9
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 211% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
80−85
medium / 768p
−
70−75
high / 1080p
4−5
27−30
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 122% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
8−9
ultra / 1080p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
4−5
27−30
medium / 1080p
3−4
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 433% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
4K / 2160p
75−80
−
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro 3000M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
10−11
50−55
medium / 768p
8−9
30−35
high / 1080p
4−5
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
4K / 2160p
1−2
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 360% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
30−35
high / 768p
30−33
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Quadro 3000M.
Full Specs
Quadro 3000M
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
Fermi
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
22 February 2011
15 August 2020
Pipelines
240
96
Core clock speed
450 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
18.00
Floating-point performance
432.0 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
625 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
28 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
