FirePro M5950 vs Quadro 4000

When choosing between FirePro M5950 and Quadro 4000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M5950 and Quadro 4000.

FirePro M5950 Check Price

Quadro 4000 Check Price

FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:

FirePro M5950 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro M5950	Quadro 4000
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	142 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 4000 has 305% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro 4000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro 4000 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro 4000 - in Desktops.
FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Quadro 4000 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 250 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000.
FirePro M5950 and Quadro 4000 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro 4000 is 1908 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	4−5	6−7
ultra / 1080p	2−3	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	16−18
medium / 1080p	6−7	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p	9−10	12−14
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	24−27
medium / 1080p	9−10	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p	120−130	130−140
medium / 768p	95−100	110−120
ultra / 1080p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	27−30	27−30
4K / 2160p	18−20	27−30
high / 768p	70−75	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p	65−70	55−60
ultra / 1080p	21−24	18−20
medium / 1080p	50−55	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	75−80	80−85
medium / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−33	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p	5−6	8−9
ultra / 1080p	4−5	7−8
4K / 2160p	2−3	3−4
low / 720p	14−16	18−20
medium / 1080p	6−7	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−11
QHD / 1440p	7−8	−
low / 720p	55−60	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Fortnite is 12% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p	9−10	12−14
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−12
QHD / 1440p	3−4	1−2
4K / 2160p	3−4	−
low / 720p	21−24	24−27
medium / 1080p	10−12	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
medium / 768p	40−45	45−50
high / 1080p	8−9	12−14
ultra / 1080p	4−5	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p	3−4	5−6
ultra / 1080p	1−2	3−4
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	9−10	12−14
medium / 1080p	5−6	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p	85−90	95−100
high / 1080p	−	90−95
ultra / 1080p	75−80	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Minecraft is 9% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p	16−18	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	30−35
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro M5950.
ultra / 1080p	6−7	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	9−10	12−14
medium / 1080p	8−9	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p	20−22	24−27
medium / 768p	12−14	16−18
high / 1080p	7−8	9−10
ultra / 1080p	5−6	6−7
4K / 2160p	2−3	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 44% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p	80−85	85−90
medium / 768p	40−45	45−50
ultra / 1080p	16−18	18−20
high / 768p	30−35	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than FirePro M5950.

Full Specs

	FirePro M5950	Quadro 4000
Architecture	Terascale 2	Fermi
Code name	Whistler-XT	GF100
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	13 April 2011	2 November 2010
Pipelines	480	256
Core clock speed	725 MHz	475 MHz
Transistor count	716 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	17.40	15.20
Floating-point performance	696.0 gflops	486.4 gflops
Length		241 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	2808 MHz
Memory bandwidth	57 GB/s	89.86 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bus support	n/a
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	67 Mh/s	44 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized
Form factor	MXM-A
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro M5950 vs Quadro 4000

FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares