GeForce MX230 vs Quadro 4000

In this comparison between GeForce MX230 and Quadro 4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX230 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce MX230 Check Price

Quadro 4000 Check Price

GeForce MX230 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce MX230 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX230 here:

GeForce MX230 Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce MX230	Quadro 4000
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	142 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 4000 has 1320% more power consumption, than GeForce MX230.
GeForce MX230 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 4000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GeForce MX230 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 4000.
GeForce MX230 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 4000 - in Desktops.
GeForce MX230 is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro 4000 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 1044 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000.
GeForce MX230 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 4192 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	9−10	6−7
ultra / 1080p	5−6	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	16−18
medium / 1080p	12−14	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	16−18	12−14
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	24−27
medium / 1080p	16−18	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce MX230 and Quadro 4000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	160−170	130−140
medium / 768p	130−140	110−120
ultra / 1080p	65−70	50−55
QHD / 1440p	35−40	27−30
4K / 2160p	27−30	27−30
high / 768p	100−110	80−85
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	24−27	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	90−95	80−85
medium / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	45−50	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	10−12	8−9
ultra / 1080p	10−11	7−8
4K / 2160p	4−5	3−4
low / 720p	24−27	18−20
medium / 1080p	12−14	9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	18−20	14−16
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−11
low / 720p	70−75	60−65
medium / 1080p	30−35	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Fortnite is 25% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	16−18	12−14
ultra / 1080p	14−16	10−12
QHD / 1440p	4−5	1−2
low / 720p	35−40	24−27
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Forza Horizon 4 is 38% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	65−70	50−55
medium / 768p	55−60	45−50
high / 1080p	18−20	12−14
ultra / 1080p	8−9	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	6−7	5−6
ultra / 1080p	4−5	3−4
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	12−14
medium / 1080p	8−9	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	100−110	95−100
high / 1080p	−	90−95
ultra / 1080p	90−95	80−85
medium / 1080p	95−100	90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	18−20	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	30−35
medium / 1080p	20−22	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	8−9	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	12−14
medium / 1080p	12−14	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	35−40	24−27
medium / 768p	21−24	16−18
high / 1080p	12−14	9−10
ultra / 1080p	8−9	6−7
4K / 2160p	7−8	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	90−95	85−90
medium / 768p	50−55	45−50
ultra / 1080p	24−27	18−20
high / 768p	40−45	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Quadro 4000.

Full Specs

	GeForce MX230	Quadro 4000
Architecture	Pascal	Fermi
Code name	N17S-G0	GF100
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	20 February 2019	2 November 2010
Pipelines	256	256
Core clock speed	1519 MHz	475 MHz
Boost Clock	1531 MHz
Transistor count	1,800 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	25.31	15.20
Floating-point performance		486.4 gflops
Length		241 mm
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	2808 MHz
Memory bandwidth	48.06 GB/s	89.86 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	+	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		44 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized
Optimus	+
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce MX230 vs Quadro 4000

GeForce MX230 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares