Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro 4000 vs Quadro K1000M

    When comparing Quadro 4000 and Quadro K1000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 4000 and Quadro K1000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    Quadro 4000 Check Price
    Quadro K1000M Check Price

    Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:

    Quadro K1000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      Quadro 4000 Quadro K1000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 142 Watt 45 Watt
    Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
    Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin
    Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
    Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro 4000 has 215% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
    • Quadro 4000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
    • Quadro 4000 and Quadro K1000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
    • Quadro 4000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
    • Quadro 4000 is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 375 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000.
    • Quadro 4000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro 4000 is 1008 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 6−7 0−1
    ultra / 1080p 4−5 −
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
    low / 720p 16−18 1−2
    medium / 1080p 8−9 0−1
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than Quadro K1000M.

    Full Specs

      Quadro 4000 Quadro K1000M
    Architecture Fermi Kepler
    Code name GF100 N14P-Q1
    Type Workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 2 November 2010 1 June 2012
    Pipelines 256 192
    Core clock speed 475 MHz 850 MHz
    Transistor count 3,100 million 1,270 million
    Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 15.20 13.60
    Floating-point performance 486.4 gflops 326.4 gflops
    Length 241 mm
    Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 2808 MHz 1800 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 89.86 GB/s 28.8 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (11_0)
    Shader Model 5.1 5.1
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 1.1 1.2
    Vulkan N/A 1.1.126
    CUDA 2.0 +
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 44 Mh/s 10 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized
    Optimus +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares