Quadro 4000 vs Quadro M2000M
In this comparison between Quadro 4000 and Quadro M2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 4000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 4000
Quadro M2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
142 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 4000 has 158% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
Quadro 4000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro M2000M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 4000.
Quadro 4000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
Quadro 4000 is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 563 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000.
Quadro 4000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 2192 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
18−20
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 144% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p
130−140
220−230
medium / 768p
110−120
190−200
ultra / 1080p
50−55
110−120
QHD / 1440p
27−30
70−75
4K / 2160p
27−30
40−45
high / 768p
80−85
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
medium / 768p
60−65
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−35
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 67% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p
8−9
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
7−8
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
9−10
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
110−120
medium / 1080p
21−24
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 114% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p
12−14
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−12
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 153% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p
50−55
95−100
medium / 768p
45−50
85−90
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 103% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p
5−6
10−12
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 21% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p
24−27
65−70
medium / 768p
16−18
40−45
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Quadro 4000.
Full Specs
Quadro 4000
Quadro M2000M
Architecture
Fermi
Maxwell
Code name
GF100
GM107
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 November 2010
2 October 2015
Pipelines
256
640
Core clock speed
475 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1197 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
15.20
43.92
Floating-point performance
486.4 gflops
1,405 gflops
Length
241 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2808 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
89.86 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
2.0
5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
44 Mh/s
173 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price