Quadro 4000 vs Radeon R7 260X

When choosing between Quadro 4000 and Radeon R7 260X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro 4000 and Radeon R7 260X.

Quadro 4000 Check Price

Radeon R7 260X Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro 4000	Radeon R7 260X
Power consumption (TDP)	142 Watt	115 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 4000 has 23% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 260X.
Quadro 4000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 260X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R7 260X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 4000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro 4000 is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 260X - with GCN 2.0.
Quadro 4000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 260X - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro 4000 is 71 mm longer, than Radeon R7 260X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	6−7	16−18
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	16−18	30−35
medium / 1080p	8−9	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 122% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−11	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	24−27	50−55
medium / 1080p	12−14	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Battlefield 5 is 113% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro 4000 and Radeon R7 260X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	130−140	210−220
medium / 768p	110−120	180−190
ultra / 1080p	50−55	100−110
QHD / 1440p	27−30	55−60
4K / 2160p	27−30	30−35
high / 768p	80−85	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 68% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	80−85	110−120
medium / 768p	60−65	95−100
ultra / 1080p	30−35	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Dota 2 is 57% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	8−9	18−20
ultra / 1080p	7−8	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	3−4	6−7
low / 720p	18−20	40−45
medium / 1080p	9−10	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−11	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	60−65	100−110
medium / 1080p	21−24	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Fortnite is 92% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	12−14	27−30
ultra / 1080p	10−12	21−24
QHD / 1440p	1−2	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	24−27	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Forza Horizon 4 is 130% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	50−55	85−90
medium / 768p	45−50	75−80
high / 1080p	12−14	30−35
ultra / 1080p	6−7	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Grand Theft Auto V is 79% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	5−6	10−11
ultra / 1080p	3−4	8−9
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	12−14	30−35
medium / 1080p	6−7	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	95−100	110−120
high / 1080p	90−95	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	90−95	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Minecraft is 15% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
low / 720p	30−35	55−60
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 55% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	12−14	30−33
medium / 1080p	10−12	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 90% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	24−27	55−60
medium / 768p	16−18	35−40
high / 1080p	9−10	20−22
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−12
4K / 2160p	6−7	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 107% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
medium / 768p	45−50	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	35−40
high / 768p	35−40	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in World of Tanks is 38% more, than Quadro 4000.

Full Specs

	Quadro 4000	Radeon R7 260X
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 2.0
Code name	GF100	Bonaire
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	2 November 2010	8 October 2013
Pipelines	256	896
Core clock speed	475 MHz
Boost Clock		1000 MHz
Transistor count	3,100 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	15.20	61.60
Floating-point performance	486.4 gflops	1,971 gflops
Length	241 mm	170 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2808 MHz
Memory bandwidth	89.86 GB/s	104 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A
CUDA	2.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	44 Mh/s	225 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		5.16 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 4000 vs Radeon R7 260X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares