Quadro 4000 vs Radeon R7 M270
In this comparison between Quadro 4000 and Radeon R7 M270 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 4000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M270 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
Quadro 4000
Radeon R7 M270
Power consumption (TDP)
142 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
Not Listed
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 4000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro 4000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M270 - in Laptops.
Quadro 4000 is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 M270 - with GCN.
Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270 is 350 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000.
Quadro 4000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
0−1
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
1−2
medium / 1080p
8−9
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than Radeon R7 M270.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p
130−140
60−65
medium / 768p
110−120
27−30
ultra / 1080p
50−55
7−8
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
high / 768p
80−85
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 242% more, than Radeon R7 M270.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p
80−85
45−50
medium / 768p
60−65
10−11
ultra / 1080p
30−35
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Dota 2 is 148% more, than Radeon R7 M270.
high / 1080p
8−9
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
9−10
−
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
21−24
medium / 1080p
21−24
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Fortnite is 181% more, than Radeon R7 M270.
high / 1080p
12−14
0−1
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
14−16
0−1
low / 768p
50−55
18−20
medium / 768p
45−50
−
high / 1080p
12−14
0−1
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Radeon R7 M270.
high / 1080p
5−6
−
ultra / 1080p
3−4
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
6−7
−
low / 768p
95−100
75−80
high / 1080p
90−95
27−30
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Minecraft is 79% more, than Radeon R7 M270.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
30−35
8−9
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M270.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
low / 768p
24−27
0−1
medium / 768p
16−18
−
high / 1080p
9−10
−
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 768p
85−90
45−50
medium / 768p
45−50
14−16
ultra / 1080p
18−20
0−1
high / 768p
35−40
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Radeon R7 M270.
Full Specs
Quadro 4000
Radeon R7 M270
Architecture
Fermi
GCN
Code name
GF100
Opal XT / Mars
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
2 November 2010
7 January 2014
Pipelines
256
384
Core clock speed
475 MHz
825 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
950 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
15.20
19.80
Floating-point performance
486.4 gflops
633.6 gflops
Length
241 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
2808 MHz
Memory bandwidth
89.86 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.4
OpenCL
1.1
Not Listed
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
2.0
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
44 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
HD3D
+
PowerTune
+
DualGraphics
+
ZeroCore
+
Switchable graphics
+
Mantle
+
Check Price
Check Price
