Quadro 4000 vs Radeon RX Vega 5

In this comparison between Quadro 4000 and Radeon RX Vega 5 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 4000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 5 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Radeon RX Vega 5 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon RX Vega 5 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 5 here:

Main Specs

  Quadro 4000 Radeon RX Vega 5
Power consumption (TDP) 142 Watt
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin
Memory type GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
  Check Price Check Price
  • Quadro 4000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 5 - in Laptops.
  • Quadro 4000 is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 5 - with Vega.
  • Quadro 4000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 5 - by 7 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 6−7 12−14
ultra / 1080p 4−5 8−9
QHD / 1440p 0−1 2−3
low / 720p 16−18 27−30
medium / 1080p 8−9 16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 5 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than Quadro 4000.

Full Specs

  Quadro 4000 Radeon RX Vega 5
Architecture Fermi Vega
Code name GF100 Vega
Type Workstation Laptop
Release date 2 November 2010 7 January 2020
Pipelines 256 320
Core clock speed 475 MHz
Boost Clock 1400 MHz
Transistor count 3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 7 nm
Texture fill rate 15.20
Floating-point performance 486.4 gflops
Length 241 mm
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 2808 MHz
Memory bandwidth 89.86 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 12 (11_0) DirectX 12_1
Shader Model 5.1
OpenGL 4.6
OpenCL 1.1
Vulkan N/A
CUDA 2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 44 Mh/s
  Check Price Check Price