FirePro M5950 vs Quadro 4000M
In this comparison between FirePro M5950 and Quadro 4000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M5950 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 4000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M5950 and Quadro 4000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M5950 and Quadro 4000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 or Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro M5950
Quadro 4000M
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 4000M has 185% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro 4000M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 250 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
FirePro M5950 and Quadro 4000M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro 4000M is 300 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
3−4
ultra / 1080p
2−3
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
14−16
medium / 1080p
6−7
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
9−10
7−8
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
18−20
medium / 1080p
9−10
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro M5950 and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
95−100
95−100
ultra / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
27−30
24−27
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
high / 768p
70−75
70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
65−70
70−75
ultra / 1080p
21−24
20−22
medium / 1080p
50−55
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
75−80
75−80
medium / 768p
50−55
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−33
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Dota 2 is 1% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
5−6
4−5
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
14−16
medium / 1080p
6−7
5−6
FirePro M5950 and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
QHD / 1440p
7−8
4−5
low / 720p
55−60
55−60
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Fortnite is 5% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
9−10
6−7
ultra / 1080p
8−9
6−7
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
21−24
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−12
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
medium / 768p
40−45
−
high / 1080p
8−9
8−9
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
3−4
2−3
ultra / 1080p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
9−10
7−8
medium / 1080p
5−6
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
high / 1080p
−
65−70
ultra / 1080p
75−80
−
FirePro M5950 and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
27−30
27−30
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
9−10
7−8
medium / 1080p
8−9
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
20−22
16−18
medium / 768p
12−14
12−14
high / 1080p
7−8
6−7
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 12% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
80−85
70−75
medium / 768p
40−45
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
16−18
high / 768p
30−35
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Quadro 4000M.
Full Specs
FirePro M5950
Quadro 4000M
Architecture
Terascale 2
Fermi
Code name
Whistler-XT
Fermi
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
13 April 2011
22 February 2011
Pipelines
480
336
Core clock speed
725 MHz
475 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
17.40
26.60
Floating-point performance
696.0 gflops
638.4 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth
57 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bus support
n/a
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
67 Mh/s
82 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Form factor
MXM-A
Check Price
Check Price
