FireStream 9250 vs Quadro 4000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and Quadro 4000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and Quadro 4000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Quadro 4000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro 4000M.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro 4000M has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 150 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 786 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9250 and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Dota 2 is 3% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Fortnite is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| FireStream 9250 and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| FireStream 9250 and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| FireStream 9250 and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| FireStream 9250 and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| FireStream 9250 and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Quadro 4000M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Fermi |
| Code name | RV770 | Fermi |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 475 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 26.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 638.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |