GeForce 820A vs Quadro 4000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 820A and Quadro 4000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 820A and Quadro 4000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce 820A
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 820A | Quadro 4000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 4000M has 566% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro 4000M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 820A is 300 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
- GeForce 820A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 820A is 600 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Dota 2 is 131% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Minecraft is 45% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 820A | Quadro 4000M | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | GF117 | Fermi |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 475 MHz |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 26.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 638.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |