GeForce 8800 GTX vs Quadro 4000M
In this comparison between GeForce 8800 GTX and Quadro 4000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 8800 GTX will be the best choice, for others Quadro 4000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 8800 GTX
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 8800 GTX | Quadro 4000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 8800 GTX has 55% more power consumption, than Quadro 4000M.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce 8800 GTX has 766 GB more memory, than Quadro 4000M.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is used in Desktops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 8800 GTX is 101 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is manufactured by 90 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 4000M is 300 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800 GTX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800 GTX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Dota 2 is 131% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Minecraft is 45% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 8800 GTX | Quadro 4000M | |
Architecture | Tesla | Fermi |
Code name | G80 | Fermi |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 8 November 2006 | 22 February 2011 |
Pipelines | 128 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 475 MHz |
Transistor count | 681 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion/sec | 26.60 |
Floating-point performance | 345.6 gflops | 638.4 gflops |
Length | 270 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.1 |
CUDA cores | 575 | |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |