GeForce GTS 360M vs Quadro 4000M
When comparing GeForce GTS 360M and Quadro 4000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTS 360M and Quadro 4000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTS 360M and Quadro 4000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTS 360M and Quadro 4000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M or Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 360M
Quadro 4000M
Power consumption (TDP)
38 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
MXM-II
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 4000M has 163% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 360M.
GeForce GTS 360M is connected by MXM-II, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro 4000M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 360M.
GeForce GTS 360M is used in Laptops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTS 360M is build with GT2xx architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 961 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
GeForce GTS 360M and Quadro 4000M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
3−4
ultra / 1080p
−
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
14−16
medium / 1080p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
18−20
medium / 1080p
−
8−9
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
60−65
120−130
medium / 768p
27−30
95−100
ultra / 1080p
7−8
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
24−27
high / 768p
16−18
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
low / 768p
70−75
70−75
ultra / 1080p
0−1
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
45−50
75−80
medium / 768p
10−11
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Dota 2 is 131% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
4−5
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
5−6
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
55−60
medium / 1080p
0−1
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
0−1
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
0−1
9−10
low / 768p
18−20
45−50
high / 1080p
0−1
8−9
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
2−3
ultra / 1080p
−
0−1
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
7−8
medium / 1080p
−
3−4
low / 768p
75−80
85−90
high / 1080p
27−30
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Minecraft is 45% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 720p
8−9
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
7−8
low / 768p
0−1
16−18
medium / 768p
−
12−14
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 768p
45−50
70−75
medium / 768p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
0−1
16−18
high / 768p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 360M
Quadro 4000M
Architecture
GT2xx
Fermi
Code name
N11E-GS1
Fermi
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
7 January 2010
22 February 2011
Pipelines
96
336
Core clock speed
1436 MHz
475 MHz
Transistor count
727 million
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
17.60
26.60
Floating-point performance
275.71 gflops
638.4 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth
57.6 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.1
5.1
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
+
2.1
CUDA cores
96
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
82 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Gigaflops
413
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price
