GeForce GTX 285 vs Quadro 4000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 285 and Quadro 4000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 285 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 4000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 285
Quadro 4000M
Power consumption (TDP)
204 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 285 has 104% more power consumption, than Quadro 4000M.
GeForce GTX 285 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro 4000M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285.
GeForce GTX 285 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 285 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 285 is 1001 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
GeForce GTX 285 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 285 is 42 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
3−4
ultra / 1080p
4−5
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
14−16
medium / 1080p
9−10
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
7−8
ultra / 1080p
10−11
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
18−20
medium / 1080p
12−14
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
140−150
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
95−100
ultra / 1080p
55−60
45−50
QHD / 1440p
30−35
24−27
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
high / 768p
85−90
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
20−22
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
80−85
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
35−40
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
8−9
4−5
ultra / 1080p
8−9
3−4
4K / 2160p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
14−16
medium / 1080p
9−10
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−12
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
60−65
55−60
medium / 1080p
24−27
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Fortnite is 21% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
6−7
ultra / 1080p
10−12
6−7
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
21−24
medium / 1080p
14−16
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Forza Horizon 4 is 45% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
55−60
45−50
medium / 768p
45−50
−
high / 1080p
12−14
8−9
ultra / 1080p
6−7
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
2−3
ultra / 1080p
3−4
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
7−8
medium / 1080p
7−8
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
95−100
85−90
high / 1080p
90−95
65−70
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
7−8
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
24−27
16−18
medium / 768p
16−18
12−14
high / 1080p
10−11
6−7
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
6−7
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 62% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
85−90
70−75
medium / 768p
45−50
35−40
ultra / 1080p
20−22
16−18
high / 768p
35−40
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Quadro 4000M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 285
Quadro 4000M
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Fermi
Code name
GT200B
Fermi
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
23 December 2008
22 February 2011
Pipelines
240
336
Core clock speed
1476 MHz
475 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
51.8 billion/sec
26.60
Floating-point performance
708.5 gflops
638.4 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
512 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1242 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth
159.0 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.0
5.1
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
+
2.1
CUDA cores
240
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
82 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)
128bit
Check Price
Check Price
