GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Quadro 4000M
When comparing GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro 4000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro 4000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Quadro 4000M
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 34% more power consumption, than Quadro 4000M.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro 4000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is used in Desktops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is 505 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro 4000M is 1194 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
3−4
ultra / 1080p
9−10
1−2
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
14−16
medium / 1080p
21−24
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
27−30
7−8
ultra / 1080p
21−24
5−6
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
55−60
18−20
medium / 1080p
30−33
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Battlefield 5 is 250% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
210−220
120−130
medium / 768p
180−190
95−100
ultra / 1080p
100−110
45−50
QHD / 1440p
60−65
24−27
4K / 2160p
30−35
−
high / 768p
150−160
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 97% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
ultra / 1080p
40−45
20−22
medium / 1080p
55−60
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
110−120
75−80
medium / 768p
100−110
55−60
ultra / 1080p
70−75
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
20−22
4−5
ultra / 1080p
18−20
3−4
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
14−16
medium / 1080p
21−24
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Far Cry 5 is 271% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
27−30
12−14
ultra / 1080p
21−24
7−8
QHD / 1440p
12−14
4−5
low / 720p
100−110
55−60
medium / 1080p
60−65
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Fortnite is 142% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
27−30
6−7
ultra / 1080p
21−24
6−7
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
low / 720p
55−60
21−24
medium / 1080p
30−35
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Forza Horizon 4 is 218% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
80−85
−
high / 1080p
30−35
8−9
ultra / 1080p
12−14
3−4
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
medium / 720p
−
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Grand Theft Auto V is 142% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
2−3
ultra / 1080p
8−9
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
7−8
medium / 1080p
14−16
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
high / 1080p
−
65−70
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro 4000M.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
60−65
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
6−7
ultra / 1080p
9−10
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
7−8
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
60−65
16−18
medium / 768p
35−40
12−14
high / 1080p
21−24
6−7
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
4K / 2160p
6−7
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
35−40
16−18
high / 768p
55−60
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Quadro 4000M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Quadro 4000M
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi
Code name
GK106
Fermi
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
26 March 2013
22 February 2011
Pipelines
768
336
Core clock speed
980 MHz
475 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
26.60
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
638.4 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
+
2.1
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
82 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price