GRID K240Q vs Quadro 4000M
When comparing GRID K240Q and Quadro 4000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K240Q and Quadro 4000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K240Q
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | Quadro 4000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro 4000M.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro 4000M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 270 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3800 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K240Q and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 37% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 128% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 60% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 109% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 133% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 125% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 41% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | Quadro 4000M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | GK104 | Fermi |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 475 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 26.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 638.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |