GRID K260Q vs Quadro 4000M
When choosing between GRID K260Q and Quadro 4000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K260Q and Quadro 4000M.
GRID K260Q
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K260Q | Quadro 4000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro 4000M.
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GRID K260Q and Quadro 4000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 270 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
- GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3800 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 220% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K260Q and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 228% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 121% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 181% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 212% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 64% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K260Q | Quadro 4000M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | GK104 | Fermi |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 475 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 26.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 638.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |