Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    NVS 510 vs Quadro 4000M

    When comparing NVS 510 and Quadro 4000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between NVS 510 and Quadro 4000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    NVS 510 Check Price
    Quadro 4000M Check Price

    Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:

    Quadro 4000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      NVS 510 Quadro 4000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 100 Watt
    Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
    Supplementary power connectors None
    Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
    Display Connectors 4x mini-DisplayPort No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro 4000M has 185% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
    • NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
    • NVS 510 and Quadro 4000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
    • NVS 510 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
    • NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
    • Core clock speed of NVS 510 is 322 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
    • NVS 510 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000M - by 40 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of NVS 510 is 582 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 0−1 3−4
    ultra / 1080p − 1−2
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
    low / 720p 1−2 14−16
    medium / 1080p 0−1 5−6
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than NVS 510.

    Full Specs

      NVS 510 Quadro 4000M
    Architecture Kepler Fermi
    Code name GK107 Fermi
    Type Workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 23 October 2012 22 February 2011
    Pipelines 192 336
    Core clock speed 797 MHz 475 MHz
    Transistor count 1,270 million 1,950 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
    Texture fill rate 12.75 26.60
    Floating-point performance 306.0 gflops 638.4 gflops
    Length 160 mm
    Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1782 MHz 1200 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 28.51 GB/s 80 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (11_0)
    Shader Model 5.1 5.1
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 1.1
    Vulkan 1.1.126 N/A
    CUDA 3.0 2.1
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 17 Mh/s 82 Mh/s
    Laptop size large
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares