Quadro 4000M vs Quadro K2000M
When comparing Quadro 4000M and Quadro K2000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 4000M and Quadro K2000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 4000M and Quadro K2000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro 4000M and Quadro K2000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M or Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 4000M
Quadro K2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 4000M has 81% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
Quadro 4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro 4000M and Quadro K2000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro 4000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 270 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
Quadro 4000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 600 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
1−2
ultra / 1080p
1−2
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
12−14
medium / 1080p
5−6
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
7−8
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
16−18
medium / 1080p
8−9
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
−
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
95−100
90−95
ultra / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
24−27
21−24
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
high / 768p
70−75
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
70−75
ultra / 1080p
20−22
16−18
medium / 1080p
40−45
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
75−80
70−75
medium / 768p
55−60
45−50
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
4−5
2−3
ultra / 1080p
3−4
2−3
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
10−12
medium / 1080p
5−6
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
QHD / 1440p
4−5
2−3
low / 720p
55−60
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Fortnite is 18% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
6−7
5−6
ultra / 1080p
6−7
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
16−18
medium / 1080p
9−10
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
45−50
40−45
high / 1080p
8−9
5−6
ultra / 1080p
3−4
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
1−2
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
5−6
medium / 1080p
3−4
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
high / 1080p
65−70
85−90
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
−
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Minecraft is 16% more, than Quadro 4000M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
27−30
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
Quadro 4000M and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
16−18
12−14
medium / 768p
12−14
8−9
high / 1080p
6−7
4−5
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
75−80
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
16−18
high / 768p
30−35
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Quadro 4000M.
Full Specs
Quadro 4000M
Quadro K2000M
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Code name
Fermi
N14P-Q3
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
22 February 2011
1 June 2012
Pipelines
336
384
Core clock speed
475 MHz
745 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
26.60
23.84
Floating-point performance
638.4 gflops
572.2 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1200 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
2.1
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
82 Mh/s
18 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
