Quadro 4000M vs Radeon HD 6750
In this comparison between Quadro 4000M and Radeon HD 6750 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 4000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 6750 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 4000M
Radeon HD 6750
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
86 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 4000M has 16% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6750.
Quadro 4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon HD 6750 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro 4000M has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6750.
Quadro 4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 6750 - in Desktops.
Quadro 4000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon HD 6750 - with TeraScale 2.
Quadro 4000M and Radeon HD 6750 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro 4000M is 150 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6750.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
1−2
ultra / 1080p
1−2
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
12−14
medium / 1080p
5−6
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
high / 1080p
7−8
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
16−18
medium / 1080p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro 4000M and Radeon HD 6750 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
95−100
90−95
ultra / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
24−27
24−27
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
high / 768p
70−75
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
low / 768p
70−75
85−90
ultra / 1080p
20−22
16−18
medium / 1080p
40−45
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6750 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
75−80
75−80
medium / 768p
55−60
50−55
ultra / 1080p
27−30
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
high / 1080p
4−5
2−3
ultra / 1080p
3−4
2−3
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
14−16
12−14
medium / 1080p
5−6
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
QHD / 1440p
4−5
2−3
low / 720p
55−60
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Fortnite is 18% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
high / 1080p
6−7
4−5
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
18−20
medium / 1080p
9−10
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
8−9
5−6
ultra / 1080p
3−4
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
high / 1080p
2−3
1−2
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
5−6
medium / 1080p
3−4
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
high / 1080p
65−70
85−90
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
−
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6750 in Minecraft is 16% more, than Quadro 4000M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
27−30
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
Quadro 4000M and Radeon HD 6750 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
low / 768p
16−18
12−14
medium / 768p
12−14
9−10
high / 1080p
6−7
4−5
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
low / 768p
70−75
75−80
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
16−18
high / 768p
30−35
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6750 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Quadro 4000M.
Full Specs
Quadro 4000M
Radeon HD 6750
Architecture
Fermi
TeraScale 2
Code name
Fermi
Juniper
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
22 February 2011
21 January 2011
Pipelines
336
720
Core clock speed
475 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
26.60
25.20
Floating-point performance
638.4 gflops
1,008.0 gflops
Length
170 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1200 MHz
1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
73.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.4
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bus support
PCIe 2.0 x16
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
82 Mh/s
92 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Eyefinity
+
Design
reference
CrossFire
+
Check Price
Check Price
