Quadro 4000M vs Radeon R9 M375X
When comparing Quadro 4000M and Radeon R9 M375X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 4000M and Radeon R9 M375X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M375X
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 4000M | Radeon R9 M375X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 M375X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M375X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 4000M.
- Quadro 4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M375X - in Desktops.
- Quadro 4000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 M375X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M375X is 450 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
- Quadro 4000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M375X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 4000M is 75 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M375X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Battlefield 5 is 90% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro 4000M and Radeon R9 M375X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Far Cry 5 is 114% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Fortnite is 47% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 112% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 4000M | Radeon R9 M375X | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Fermi | Tropo |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 475 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1015 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.60 | 40.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 638.4 gflops | 1,299 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Check Price |